Comparison Planner Basic, Planner Premium, Jira Standard, Jira Premium and Altus PPM
Comparison of Microsoft Planner, Atlassian Jira, and Altus PPM: features, interplay, and suitability for comprehensive project and portfolio...
3 min read
Renke Holert
Jun 7, 2026, 11:47:25 AM
How do Microsoft Planner, Atlassian Jira, and the Microsoft 365 PPM solutions Altus and xPM compare with Asana, Monday, Wrike, Celoxis, Meisterplan, and Planview ProjectAdvantage? Below is an overview of the different capabilities of each product
| Business process | Planner Basic | Planner Premium | Jira Standard | Jira Premium | Altus PPM | Projectum xPM | Asana Enterprise | Monday.com Enterprise | Meisterplan | Celoxis | Wrike Enterprise | Planview ProjectAdvantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Idea and requirements management | ||||||||||||
| Capturing challenges and ideas | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Capturing requirements incl. resource and financial needs | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Evaluating requirements against strategic goals | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Project management | ||||||||||||
| Task planning in a list | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Planning on a Kanban board | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Graphical scheduling based on dependencies | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Graphical baseline comparison | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Custom fields per project | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Cross-project custom fields | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Resource management | ||||||||||||
| Effort estimation at task level with named resources, e.g. with people | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Effort estimation with generic resources, e.g. with departments | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Transfer of effort estimates from task level to project level | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Effort estimation at project level by period, e.g. by month | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Display of cross-project resource conflicts | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Submitting resource requests to team leads | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ |
| Fulfilling requests by team leads/resource managers with people | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ |
| Heatmap for resource utilization | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Cost and financial management | ||||||||||||
| Cost planning by cost type and structure (forecast/budget) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Actual, remaining, and total cost calculation (ETC/EAC) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| ERP integration without proprietary interfaces (incl. SAP, Dynamics 365) for actual costs, budgets, and forecasts | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ |
| Cost monitoring with KPIs and traffic-light indicators | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Automatic versioning of cost plans | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ⚠️ |
| Time tracking | ||||||||||||
| Native time tracking per task/project | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Planned vs. actual hours comparison at project level | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Approval workflow for timesheets | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ⚠️ |
| Risk management | ||||||||||||
| Structured risk register (identification, assessment, owner, status) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Risk assessment by probability and impact (risk matrix) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Mitigation and countermeasures with tracking and due dates | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| AI support for identifying, assessing, and determining mitigation/countermeasures | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ❌ |
| Stakeholder management | ||||||||||||
| Capturing stakeholders and roles (register with influence, interest, communication needs) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ |
| AI-supported, stakeholder-specific status communication | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ❌ |
| Program and portfolio management | ||||||||||||
| Standalone program and portfolio planning | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Managing dependencies between projects | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Scenario planning by costs and resources as well as strategic goals | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Permission model and licensing | ||||||||||||
| Role-based permission model by project and organizational unit | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Permission control down to field level | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ |
| Read access for external users (list/board) possible without a license | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Read access for external users to the schedule possible with a license | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| IT security and integrations | ||||||||||||
| Data storage in Microsoft 365 incl. M365 governance features | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Integration with Microsoft Planner | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Integration with Microsoft Project | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ |
| Integration with Azure DevOps | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ⚠️ |
| Integration with Jira | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Integration with HR systems (incl. SAP HR / SuccessFactors, Workday) | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ |
| Integration with ERP systems (incl. SAP FICO, PS, PM) | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ |
| Automation and AI | ||||||||||||
| Integration with Power Automate | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ❌ |
| Use with Copilot | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ❌ |
| Reporting | ||||||||||||
| Built-in reports and charts | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Built-in Power BI reports for project, program, portfolio, resource, and strategy management | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ |
| Scalability and administration | ||||||||||||
| Multi-tenant support (multiple organizational units in one instance) | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| User scalability without architecture changes | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Central administration and configuration (tenant-wide settings, governance) | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Role-based permissions at tenant level (global roles for PMO, admin, viewer) | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| REST API availability for automation and third-party integration | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Operations monitoring, central logging, and auditability | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Microsoft 365 integration | ||||||||||||
| Teams & SharePoint integration | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ |
| Outlook calendar synchronization | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ |
| Single Sign-On via Entra ID/Azure AD | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Easy customization of fields, forms, workflows, and tables by the user – including via AI voice command (“vibe coding”) | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Customer-specific customizations are preserved across version upgrades | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ |
| Existing M365 knowledge (Teams, SharePoint, Power Platform) directly usable for operation and day-to-day use | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Implementation and operations | ||||||||||||
| Automatic data migration from Project Online | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Support for international languages incl. German (user interface) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Support from a German-speaking implementation partner | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ |
| Operation in a data center in Germany/Austria/Switzerland by the vendor (selectable data residency) | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ |
| Operation under full local data sovereignty (own data center / BSI IT-Grundschutz / suitable for VS-NfD classified data) | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ⚠️ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ⚠️ |
Legend: ✅ = fully supported | ❌ = not supported | ⚠️ = limited / only available in certain plans
Comparison of Microsoft Planner, Atlassian Jira, and Altus PPM: features, interplay, and suitability for comprehensive project and portfolio...
Compare Microsoft Planner Basic, SharePoint Lists, Planner Premium, Loop, and Jira Business Projects to find the right task management tool for your...
Efficient project management with Microsoft Teams: how Teams streamlines collaboration, communication, and integrates Microsoft project tools...