Comparison Planner Basic, Planner Premium, Jira Standard, Jira Premium and Altus PPM
Comparison of Microsoft Planner, Atlassian Jira, and Altus PPM: features, interplay, and suitability for comprehensive project and portfolio...
3 min read
Renke Holert
Nov 29, 2025, 8:33:18 AM
What are the differences between the well-known task management solutions from Microsoft and Atlassian? See the differences between Planner Basic and Premium plans, SharePoint List, Jira Business Projects and Microsoft Loop in the following comparison.
In brief
Microsoft and Atlassian offer many different solutions for tracking open issues, requirements and tasks. The larger solutions such as Microsoft Project, Azure DevOps and Jira Software Projects are deliberately excluded here. The smaller solutions include Microsoft Planner Basic plans, Microsoft Lists, Microsoft Planner Premium plans and the business projects from Atlassian Jira. Below is a brief comparison of what we consider to be some of the key features of the products.
| Feature | Microsoft Planner Basic |
Microsoft List SharePoint Lists |
Jira Business Spaces in Jira Standard (Projects) |
Microsoft Planner Premium Planner Plan 1-3 (formerly Project for the web) |
Microsoft Loop (Copilot Pages, Copilot Notebooks) |
| Kanban board for each project | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Kanban board across all projects | No | No | with Jira Software spaces | No | No |
| Kanban board in Microsoft Teams | Yes | Yes | No, not part of the Teams integration | Yes | Yes |
| Hierarchical tasks | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Linking tasks | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Comments | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Pasting images via the clipboard | No | No | Yes | No | Yes |
| Mentions in comments | Yes, in task chat | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Comments per task in Teams | Yes, task chat in Planner in Teams | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Categorization/Labels | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Free access for external users | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Sign in with Microsoft account | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Task titles are searched through Microsoft 365 Search and Copilot | No | Yes | Yes, if integrated | Yes, if integrated | No |
| Support through artificial intelligence | Yes, Planner Agent with Microsoft 365 Copilot | No | Yes, Rovo included from Jira Standard | Yes, Planner Agent with Microsoft 365 Copilot | No |
| Time recording | with Allocatus | No | with Allocatus | with Allocatus | No |
Further information on Planner Premium, including a comparison with MS Project and the differences between Microsoft Project and the Planner Premium license plans Planner Plan 1 and Project and Planner Plan 3 and 5, can be found here.
The Microsoft Planner Premium plans come closest to the Microsoft Project Online software that emerged from Project Server. The Premium plans were previously called Project for web and are technically based on the calculation logic of Microsoft Project. However, there are limitations here, for example in cross-project project and resource management. Projectum xPM and Altus are better suited as a replacement here. For details, see Microsoft Project Online ends on 30 September 2026 – alternatives.
No. Planner Agent is available in all basic and premium plans that are shared with a Microsoft 365 Group. It requires a Microsoft 365 Copilot license; without one, users can still collaborate on the plan but cannot interact with the agent. Premium plans remain necessary if you want to generate tasks from goals.
No. Atlassian Rovo is included in the Standard, Premium and Enterprise cloud plans and is activated automatically. Only the monthly allowance differs: for Jira and Confluence it is 25 credits per user per month on Standard, 70 on Premium and 150 on Enterprise, pooled at organisation level.
In Planner Basic, Microsoft Lists, Planner Premium and Loop, yes — through guest access to the Microsoft 365 Group. Jira counts every contributor as a licensed user; free guest access exists only in the Jira Service Management customer portal, not in business spaces.
Planner Premium and Jira Business Spaces both model hierarchies and links, and Planner Premium adds scheduling logic derived from Microsoft Project. Planner Basic and Microsoft Lists are not designed for this; Loop is a collaboration surface without planning logic.
Loop — including Copilot Pages and Copilot Notebooks — is suited to working on content together and to task lists inside a document. It lacks the structure needed for traceable task ownership across several teams and projects; it complements Planner rather than replacing it.
A feature table answers what a tool can do — not which tool fits your organisation. In practice the decision rarely fails on the feature list, but on the questions beside it: which licenses you already own, how external partners get access, how effort reaches your cost accounting, and who still maintains the configuration two years from now.
Holert guides that selection as a vendor-neutral consulting partner with more than 25 years of experience in project, programme and portfolio management on Microsoft and Atlassian — methodically along PMI and SAFe, technically from Microsoft Planner and Project through Jira to Altus PPM and Projectum xPM. Companies such as Rohde & Schwarz, KUKA and LAPP rely on our support. Our fixed-price PPM software selection provides a defined framework for it, and our customer references give an overview of past projects.
Comparison of Microsoft Planner, Atlassian Jira, and Altus PPM: features, interplay, and suitability for comprehensive project and portfolio...
Microsoft Project and Microsoft Planner integration, send tasks from Microsoft Project to your team in the Planner app, e.g. in Microsoft Teams
Discover the features and benefits of Microsoft Planner Premium, a flexible project management tool that enhances collaboration and task organization...